Virginia Officer Fails To Record Sobriety Tests Cases Dismissed
An officer’s failure to record sobriety tests gives four men the ability to successfully defend their DUI charges.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving’s most recent numbers show that over 27,000 people in Virginia have been convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol. For people living in Fairfax and elsewhere, a DUI conviction comes with severe penalties such as fines, jail time, court costs and license suspension/revocation.
Many DUI convictions are based on evidence that includes breath test results, field sobriety tests and officers’ descriptions of the driver’s appearance and behaviors. The American Automobile Association states that one tool that has proven especially helpful to law enforcement agencies is the use of video and audio recording in DUI stops. The recorded evidence can be used to back up the officer’s conduct during the stop, the administration of sobriety tests and to prove that the officer had a just reason for stopping the vehicle.
No recorded evidence
While recording a DUI stop can often lead to a conviction, the policy that requires officers to use video and audio as part of the process can also profit the person accused. This happened recently in four cases of drunk driving within Fairfax County. According to The Washington Post, the same officer pulled over four different men and then failed to record the sobriety tests he conducted on them.
The officer claimed that he did not move the dash camera to focus on the men because he did not want to go back to the patrol car and leave the men alone. He also stated that he needed a flatter surface on which to conduct the tests and that is why the camera shows them moving out of view. Additionally, the officer had apparently turned off the audio recorder. It should be noted that officers are not required by department policy to video record sobriety tests or keep people within view of the cameras, but it is recommended. However, they are required to make sure that the audio and video recording equipment is working.
Conflicting accounts
The lack of recorded evidence was used as a defense by the men, who also claimed that the officer’s account of the stop was not accurate. The combination of these two factors apparently convinced the judge that the men’s claim had merit. There was no mention of chemical testing evidence so it appears to have been the men’s words against those of the officer’s. Without the audio recording or a video recording to back up the officer’s statements, the men were able to successfully defend themselves against the drunk driving charges.
When people in Fairfax are arrested and charged with DUI, they have the legal right to question whether law enforcement acted as they should. Therefore, they may find it of benefit to meet with a defense attorney.
Hear From Our Happy Clients
At Lawrence, Smith & Gardner, your satisfaction is our priority! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.
-
Dear Mr. Brillantine and Mr. Smith,- Previous Client
Thank you so much for your time and effort in the past several weeks. I am forever grateful for your help! Thank you. -
Dear Mr. Smith,- Previous Client
I just wanted to drop you a note to express my thanks and appreciation for your professional and courteous help and service. The efficient way you and your staff handled my case, resulted in less anxiety for me. -
Dear Mr. Smith,- Previous Client
We just want to thank you for all your help in our son’s recent traffic case. Things were looking extremely bleak. However, thanks to your knowledge of the law, persistence, ability to talk to people, hard work and grace … What a relief it has been. We also appreciate the courtesy and professionalism of your wonderful staff. -
Dear Ron,- Previous Client
I am consumed with awe for your legal maneuvering to assist me in court yesterday. Thank you for making it possible for me to continue with my life. -
To Ron Smith,- Previous Client
I just wanted to extend my gratitude to you for representing me earlier this month when I went back to court to obtain my restricted license. I appreciate the courtesy and professionalism from you and your staff and under no circumstances hope to ever need your services for a serious matter like that again. -
Dear Mr. Smith,- Previous Client
Thank you for all your help. Please extend my thanks also to Martin for his patient support of an incoherent client, as well as to Lisa for her many phone calls. Thanks for that usually elusive gift … a second chance. -
Ron,- Previous Client
I can’t thank you enough for everything. If it weren’t for you I would be in a world of hurt today. I owe you so many thanks. If you ever need anything!! Please pass along all my thanks to your staff and co-workers. Please let Lisa I’m so sorry you missed her lunch too. Thanks again Ron you ROCK! -
Dear Mr. Smith,- Previous Client
I wanted to tell you how grateful I am for your help with my recent difficult situation. I was amazed at your skill and knowledge of the court system, and appreciative of your insight in these matters. I can look back on this experience as a valuable lesson and continue on with my life. Thank you for giving me that opportunity.
What Sets Us Apart
-
An Accessible Team With Direct Communication
-
Free Initial Consultations for All Clients
-
Numerous Positive Reviews from Our Clients
-
A Diligent Approach to Each Case
-
More Than 40 Years Serving Our Community
